Blade Geometry FAQAuthor: Joe Talmadge Welcome to the blade geometry FAQ. Our objective is to provide a working knowledge of blade shapes and grinds. After reading the FAQ, I hope you'll be better able to answer the question, "I need to do job X, what kinds of knives should I consider?". We will start with some general characteristics of blade shapes, then talk about blade grinds, then put it all together to discuss specific blade patterns. The last section, a brief analysis of some common designs, will build upon the previous sections. It's important to keep in mind that the characteristics can be as important as blade shape. When you're done with the FAQ, you should be able to make decisions not only on blade shape but on other attributes. If you need to slice, you'll know to look for a nice curving belly -- and not get hung up on what the ostensible blade shape is supposed to be.
I. Blade Grinds I. Blade GrindsThe Hollow Grind For designs where slicing is important, but the slice doesn't need to go too deep, this grind is an excellent choice. Many hunting knives are hollow ground, because field dressing is often best done with a knife that slices exceptionally well through soft tissues. Unfortunately, if you hit a bone, you can chip the edge, so the flat grind (see below) is also used often. Another advantage of the hollow ground knife, at least at the beginning, is ease of sharpening. Most hollow grinds thicken slightly towards the edge. That means that as you sharpen (at least at first), the blade gets thinner and easier to sharpen. After this, however, the blade begins thickening non-linearly and sharpening will become more difficult. The ultimate push cutter, the straight razor, is usually hollow ground. The Chisel Grind Accurate slices are very difficult with the chisel grind, due to the fact that the non-symmetrical design forces the knife to curve in the medium being cut. The Sabre Grind The sabre grind is found on many military classic designs such as the Randall #1 and the kabar. The Flat Grind The edge on this design also penetrates better for slicing and chopping. The hollow grind expands non-linearly as you go up the blade, the sabre grind expands linearly but very quickly. The flat grind expands linearly and slowly. Kitchen knives are usually flat ground, because when chopping/slicing food you need to push the blade all the way through the food. This grind is an outstanding compromise between strength and cutting ability, sacrificing little for either. The Convex Grind The Dual-Ground Reinforced Tanto II. Blade CharacteristicsThe Belly If slicing and slashing are important to you, you want to look for a nice curving belly. However, there are always tradeoffs. Typically, the more belly a knife has, the less acute its point. So you get better slicing, but piercing ability goes down. A knife with tons of belly is the Emerson Commander (which actually has a recurved belly), and you can see the point on this knife is not very acute. Trailing point skinners are basically all belly, because you do nothing but slice with them. A knife with little belly is the classic F-S dagger, and this knife has an incredible point for piercing but is not a great slicer/slasher. So you trade off belly (slicing) for point (piercing). There are some games that can be played here. For example, if the knife design has lots of belly for slicing, the designer can clip the point and add a falsed edge to make it a bit sharper. The Re-curved Belly The recurved belly presents more edge to the material being cut, and in slicing forces the material into the edge. It is an even better slicer/slasher, and in a big knife (see some of Walter Brend's knives), can make for excellent chopping geometry as well. The downside of this design is that it is *very* difficult to sharpen. Freehand on a big stone, it's nearly impossible. Some of the sharpening rigs available make the job easier, but in any case it's still difficult. Bellies and Angles Another method to change the angles is to join the blade and handle at an angle. This can change the ergonomics for the better on some designs. Both methods exaggerate the angle change for slicing, slashing, or chopping, and this in turn increases performance. The chopping ability of the kukri, the chopping/slashing/slicing ability of the ATAK, and the slicing ability of the AFCK are due in part to belly angles. The Point For some designs, like a dagger, the objective of the design is to pierce. So a dagger has a thin point, sharp on both sides to decrease the profile and to enable the knife to cut its way in from all sides. Other designs, like the skinner, put the point up and out of the way since the objective of the design is to slice. The Americanized tanto has a very strong point, due to the spine being full thickness very close to the point. This means it won't penetrate anything like a dagger into a soft target, but the massively strong point can survive a thrust into a very hard target that would break a dagger point. Some tricks can be employed to make the point stronger (and worse at piercing) or sharper (and weaker). A false edge can be ground into a point to make it pierce better, for example. The other important decision about the point is where to put it. It can be placed to provide a number of characteristics. Some knives place the point down almost at the edge. For example, the Japanese-style chef knife, the santuko, has this format. The knife is used to chop food and do long slices, so a low point means maximum straight edge length. The trailing point hunter, which is used for slicing in a way which requires a belly, puts the point way up high and out of the way. Knives whose points require maximum control -- a hunter used for dressing out game, or a defensive knife -- want the point to be in line with the users hand. This usually means the point must be below the spine of the blade. There are a number of methods to achieve this, such as dropping the point in a convex curve (drop point format), a concave curve (clip point format), or straight line (still called a clip point, usually). Blade Thickness Once the blade thickness is chosen, the particular grind type (see below) can reinforce the attributes of that thickness, or try to make up for any weakness. For example, on a thick blade, a flat or hollow grind can be utilized, so that even though the spine is thick & strong, the edge is thin and cuts a bit better than expected. Or on a thin blade, a sabre grind can be used to make the edge a bit stronger than it would otherwise be. Of course, the grind can reinforce rather than counteract the blade thickness. For example, on the AG Russell Deerhunter, the flat grind is done on a thin blade, to make for exceptional cutting ability, but the design lacks weight for chopping and strength for prying, being exceptionally thin. Edge Thickness The blade shape, plus the thickness of the blade spine, combined with the grind type, determines the edge thickness. The edge thickness is one of the only factors that can be modified easily by the knife owner (rather than the maker). Remember that if you're not happy with the way a knife is performing, there's no reason you're stuck with the factory edge. Feel free to re-sharpen, grinding a lower-angle thinner edge into the knife. At some point, if you go too thin the edge will start chipping out, that's an indication that you need to thicken the edge back up. Also see the Sharpening FAQ. The Primary-Bevel Edge However, some knives do not have a secondary bevel to form the edge. Scandanavian knives, like the Finnish puukko, only have a single bevel. So ostensibly, the puukko is a sabre grind (see below). However, because the primary bevel goes all the way down to the edge, the edge ends up being a thin high-performance edge rather than a thicker stronger edge. Combined with the normally thin blades on the puukko, the edge ends up being thin enough to cut really well. Similarly, some chisel-ground knives also feature a primary-bevel edge. Again, it guarantees thinness and sharpness at the edge. The most popular chisel-ground folder, Benchmade's CQC7, has an edge that is formed by a secondary bevel. However, many other chisel-ground knives do not have the secondary bevel. III. Blade Shapes, and What They're Good ForThe Clip Point The tip is controllable and sharp, and the belly provides good slicing/slashing, and so this format is popular on formats from utility knives to camp knives to fighters to hunting knives. The Drop Point Due to the very controllable point, this pattern is very popular on hunting knives, where it's important to keep the point from nicking an organ. The inclusion of plenty of belly makes it a good slicer and slasher. This format is also popular on utility knives and even fighters, where the strong point can hold up to heavy use. The point on a drop point usually won't be quite as sharp as that on a clip-point, but will be stronger. The Tanto (Americanized and Chisel-Ground) The point on this format is incredibly strong, due to the spine keeping its full width until very close to the point, and then a strong flat grind being used to create the point. There is a lot of metal up front at that point, which makes this format not the best piercer into soft materials, but incredibly strong and able to survive thrusting into very hard materials. The high point also provides less control than the drop- and clip-point formats. The hollow ground straight edge is very sharp. There is no belly per se, so slicing can be awkward, and this is not the best format for general utility use since a belly is so useful for that. For hard use where a very strong point is needed, this format is exceptional. The very sharp hollow-ground straight edge performs very well for any job that doesn't require a belly. For slashing, the promotors of this format claim the secondary point positively reinforces the slash, so even though the design is bellyless it still slashes well. A hot trend today is chisel-ground tantos. These knives usually have a basic Americanized tanto shape, often with the point clipped. But it is ground on one side one, usually a sabre grind (rather than the dual-ground Americanized tanto popularized by Cold Steel). Many chisel-ground tantos have one a single bevel to the edge, with no secondary bevel to form the edge itself, which leaves the format very sharp. Aside from the lack of belly, the non-symmetrical grind makes this type of knife difficult to cut straight, making it even less useful for general utility. The extremely thin edge cuts well for shallow cuts, but the edge usually reaches full spine thickness relatively quickly, so deep-cutting performance can suffer. I have not discussed the classic Japanese tanto shape, because that design is not seen much in everyday cutlery. The Sheepsfoot The Japanese style chef's knife, the Santuko, also is close to this format, though the belly on that knife curves slightly. There's no need for a point for the usage of this knife, so the dropped point maximizes the straight edge length. The Dagger The dagger usually has little or no belly per se, instead tapering in relatively straight line towards the point, though you will see great variations in the degree to which there's a curve towards the point. In addition, both edges are ground from the exact center of the blade. The geometry, between the lack of belly and the quickly-thickening edges, is not good for slicing/slashing. The Spear Point The Trailing Point The Hook Blade IV. Steel and Blade GeometryDoes the blade geometry have any affect on the steel used? Well, indirectly. In theory, the blade geometry is designed for a certain function, and the steel chosen will also be one suited for that function. This doesn't mean there's an obvious answer as to which steel should be used on which knife -- quite the opposite, there are almost always lots of different steels that will work well for a particular knife. But understanding the strengths and weaknesses of both the blade geometry and the steel will help you decide which combinations you desire. For blade geometry, we're often playing off cutting ability versus toughness. For steels, we're playing off toughness versus edge holding versus stainlessness versus sharpenability. For a salt water dive knife, we may choose a cheap stainless steel (which are usually *very* stainless due to low carbon content) over a high-carbon stainless or a carbon steel. For a machete, we usually choose an inexpensive carbon steel, for economic and functional reasons. Economically, the machete is meant to be an inexpensive tool, and the inexpensive carbon steels are cheap, available, and easy to work. Functionally, we have a thin-bladed machete, so we need all the toughness we can get; also, we get easy sharpenability. V. Putting It All TogetherOkay, now we know the characteristics, grinds, and blade shapes, and what they are all good for. If you understand this, you can begin to see how to mix and match features to fine-tune a knife for the functions you want. For example, you may want a tanto, but are willing to sacrifice some of the point strength for control and piercing ability. Having read the FAQ, you know you can clip the point (controllability) and thin the edge via a false edge (piercing ability), which is exactly the approach Benchmade took with their Stryker. Or if you want your tanto to slice a bit better, you can make the straight edge slightly convex to simulate a belly -- the approach taken by Microtech on their SOCOM tanto. By mixing-n-matching, we can enhance a design's strengths or sacrifice a little to make up for a deficiency somewhere else. With that in mind, let's briefly examine some popular knife designs, and see if we can figure out why the designers made the choices they did. Two Combat/Utility Knives The grind chosen was a sabre grind. This makes the edge very strong, but sacrifices cutting ability (versus a flat grind). In theory, the sabre grind might have been chosen because of the very hard use and abuse this knife may go through, not just as a knife but as a pry bar or hole digger. At least as importantly, the sabre grind is faster and cheaper to produce than a flat grind, important when many knives have to be turned out. The Mad Dog ATAK takes a different route, going with a thick spine and flat grind, but retaining the clip-point format. The flat grind means the edge will outcut the kabar, and the thick spine helps assure robustness for hard use (as does the differential heat treatment). A positive included angle (also discussed above) enhances chopping and slicing performance. Sort of a high-performance version of the standard combat/utility knife, more expensive to produce but outperforming the standard in just about every other category. The Camp Knife Three Folders The Sebenza had a straight clipped point, for excellent control, and plenty of belly. A very high hollow grind provides a thin edge, for great push-cutting and slicing. The AFCK has a sabre grind, but still performs wonderfully. The blade is relatively thin, so even with the sabre grind the edge remains fairly thin and performs well. In addition, the blade is at an angle to the handle, providing even better slicing and slashing performance. The straight-clipped point is very sharp and controllable. These two folder makers have made different design decisions, but both have achieved excellent results. The main objectives -- a working point, a belly, and a thin edge -- are achieved through different designs. The Microtech SOCOM tanto is another design worth examining. It is ostensibly an Americanized tanto. However, the designers have made a large number of interesting tweaks to enhance the design. First, for point control, the point is clipped slightly and the blade meets the handle at an angle -- both of these things bring the point in-line for control. To make the point a better piercer, the front bevel is at a much smaller angle to the point than is normally seen. The normally straight edge is slightly curved, and combined with the low-angle front edge, the secondary point ends up not very sharp. So this is a tanto with a bit of a belly, and combined with the blade/handle angle, functions well as a slasher/slicer. Lastly, Microtech ground in false edge bevels on the spine, which disappear near the point. This leaves the point full width for strength, but removes some weight (and adds good looks) along the spine. A Hunter A Custom-Made Folder Related Categories |

